I am an Atheist, I believe in Atheism not because I "want to sin", but because I prefer to believe in Science over strawman arguments for God with many "proof" either being unrelated to God, a fallacy(like Strawman, ad populum, circular reasoning, argument from ignorance, God of the Gaps, black and white fallacy, personal incredulity fallacy, etc.) or assumptions based on "faith". I have nothing against theists and I would be happy to talk or debate any theist any time, anywhere, but I highly doubt God, if it exists, is even a benevolent being, with what is known, God is at most a neutral deity. I believe faith is irrational, as it is not based on anything merely hoping that whatever deity or religion one believes in exist even though there is no empirical proof for it(essentially making it baseless). I highly think all religions are man-made. If God's message is to us was so dire, so vitally important, then why wouldn't he give it to us in such a clear and precise way, so that we would all be in agreement. As evident as a simple math problem in which there is universal agreement, rather than trusting his precious message to be spread by fallible, corruptible human beings. Why would the Almighty God allow the continuation of such widespread falsehoods in his name which would be effortless for him to correct, or ever need to correct in the first place, because a perfect being would have gotten it right from the very beginning and I personally can't find myself worshipping a mass murderer, especially in the Abrahamic religions. There is no way God can just defy logic, there has to be a logical explanation for everything God can do because if God can do it, why can't everyone else? Saying God "transcends time and reality" is illogical and impossible and if people need to use mental gymnastics to justify their "all-benevolent" deity then they're probably not a benevolent entity. There is nothing wrong with being neutral and saying "we don't know"...there is no need to make up illogical answers.