Hey, I’m an Orthodox Christian who challenges your presuppositions about metaphysics, ethics, and metalogic. I’m not saying I don’t have presuppositions; I’m saying EVERYONE does. However, these presuppositions are not challenged enough to serve as a justification for anything in reality. Does your presupposition function as a grounding to ask meta-level questions? How do you even arrive at the conclusion of your assumptions, and how does that provide coherence or objectivity to the world? Saying we don’t know or can’t answer these questions is itself a presupposition that functions as an answer. I want JUSTIFICATION!