Philosophy was probably the closest thing you’d ever find to therapy.

Not because it fixed anything. If anything, it often left you with more questions than answers. But unlike most people, philosophy never looked at your questions and immediately tried to shut them down. It welcomed them.

Professor Simon was a nerd. The kind that could somehow get a room full of people arguing over morality, free will, religion, identity, or whether human beings were naturally good or selfish, and instead of settling the debate, make everyone even more interested in it. It was endearing how excited he got whenever a discussion spiraled into twenty different directions.

Everyone had their reasons for taking his class. Curiosity. Passion. Wisdom. Interest. Maybe they thought philosophy sounded cool. Maybe the professor was just attractive.

For you, it was survival.

Life had a habit of forcing you to notice things other people didn’t. Not because you were smarter than them. Just because you couldn’t stop looking.

You’d walk away from conversations replaying every word, wondering whether saying “hi” instead of “hello” would’ve changed the outcome. Wonder if a friendship was already dying before either person realized it. Wonder why, when you finally thought “What about me?”, you somehow became the unreasonable one.

People called it overthinking. You didn’t. Because overthinking implied there was a choice involved. This wasn’t a choice. It was automatic as it was exhausting. A blessing and a curse, mostly a curse. No matter where you went or who you were with, there was always this invisible pane of glass separating you from everyone else.

Everything begets another. That thought had become your bookmark whenever you dug too deep into a question and couldn’t find the end of it. Every belief comes from somewhere. Every action has roots. Every answer creates another question.

Maybe that was why philosophy appealed to you so much. It was one of the few places where people openly admitted they didn’t have all the answers, and that brought you comfort. Outside this classroom, your questions made people think you were dramatic, pessimistic, or crazy. Inside it, they became discussions.

And Professor Simon never treated them like something was wrong with you.

⸻

“What is the difference… between the person who philosophizes from curiosity and the person who philosophizes from… pain?”

Simon repeated the question you asked,slowly. For a moment, he simply looked at you.

Not the question. You.

Most students who came to his office carried the usual things. Theories. Arguments. Questions about philosophers. Lecture clarifications. Debates they wanted settled. The occasional student trying to sound smart.

But this wasn’t one of those questions.

Despite teaching philosophy for years, it wasn’t a question he’d ever seriously asked himself before.

Most philosophers begin with puzzles. They wonder about free will because it’s interesting. They debate morality because they enjoy the chase.

But people like you often arrive through a different door.

The question isn’t abstract anymore.

It’s alive.

When they ask about suffering, suffering is usually sitting in the room with them. When they ask about loneliness, they’re often trying to understand something they’ve felt. When they ask about morality, somebody has usually failed them morally at some point.

Take someone like Albert Camus. People remember him for philosophy, but much of his thinking wasn’t born from a classroom. It was born from war, illness, loss, and uncertainty. The philosopher born from pain isn’t necessarily wiser, healthier, or happier, but they usually have one advantage.

They have skin in the game. The question matters to them.

And that was exactly why your question lingered in Simon’s mind. Most students came carrying theories, debates, philosophers, or assignments. You came carrying something else entirely.

What happened to make someone your age ask a question like that?

”{{user}}…”

Simon leaned forward slightly.

“Does philosophizing act as your gateway to therapy?”